Pages

Thursday, October 24, 2013

CHQ News - Letters to administration to consider Rule 38 transfer cases...

1. Inter-Circle Transfer of Inspectors of Posts under Rule 38 of P&T Manual Vol. IV—Case of Sri Manoj Kumar Dhaka, SDI (P) Dhandhuka Sub Division (Gandhinagar Division) to Rajasthan Circle. CLICK HERE to see draft letter.

2. Request to accommodate the surplus qualified Inspector Posts of Tamilnadu Circle working in Gujarat Circle in the Home Circle. CLICK HERE to see the draft letter.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Final result for Direct Recruitments of PA/SA of various divisions of Rajasthan Circle for the year 2011 & 2012

Please click here for Results of PA/SA recritment for the year 2011 & 2012 in various Divisions of Rajasthan Postal Circle

Thursday, October 10, 2013

DPC for the promotion to the cadre of PS Gr. B for the year 2013-14

It is learnt from Directorate that, list of selected officers for the promotion to the cadre of PS Gr. B for the vacancies of 2013-14 have been released today. 

To view the list, please CLICK HERE. 

Following officials selected from Rajasthan Circle

1. Shri Ram Karan Kumhar, ASP Jhunjhunu Allotted to Rajasthan Circle
2. Shri S.C.Sharma, ASP (HQ) Kota, Allotted to Rajasthan Circle.
3. Shri Surjan Ram, AD(Tech.), CO Jaipur, Allotted to Rajasthan Circle.
4. Shri L.L.Meghwal, Supdt. CSD Jaipur, Allotted to Rajasthan Circle.
5. Shri Sohan Lal Bhambhi, ASP Tonk, Allotted to Rajasthan Circle.

Association Congratulate all promoted officers

Friday, October 4, 2013

CHQ News - Proposal for merger of ASP cadre with PS Gr. B cadre

All are aware that recently GS, CHQ President, CHQ Treasurer, OGS-II and CS WB Circle met with Member (P), DDG (Estt) and discussed the pending issues including merger of IP/ASP cadre. During the course of discussion it was apprised to the administration that copy of the resolution passed in AIC Bangalore on merger issue was submitted to Directorate on 22/2/2012. Thereafter officers dealing our case asked this Association to submit a fresh proposal of merger of IP/ASP cadre immediately. The essence of the scheduled meetings at different level remains that association have to accept merger of ASPs to IPs and ASPs to PS Group “B” in a given ratio by surrendering gazetted status, ASPs presently enjoying.

Now, time has come that we have to think with some broad mind. As such arguable proposal from our side should consist of upgradation of all the divisions to class-I having one or two posts of PS Group “B”with independent powers by up-gradating the existing post of ASP(HQ) to SP(HQ) and conversion of all the sub divisions to that of IPs in the GP of Rs.4600/- making them comparable with Inspectors in CBDT/ CBEC after merger of remaining posts of ASP to that of IPs. Where posts of OS exist that should also be upgraded to SP (HQ) or Dy SP. It will also be proposed that all post of ASPs presently held in Circles and Regions be upgraded to the level of Asstt. Directors. The post of IP (CO/RO) can be retained as it is.

The IP cadre will be benefited in the following way:
  1. GP of Rs.4600/- at entry stage.
  2. First MACP in GP of Rs. 4800/-(direct recruits) & 2nd for promotee after 10 years service in IP cadre
  3. Next promotion in PS Group “B’” in GP of Rs 4800/- after 16-17 years but without financial benefit.
  4. 2nd MACP in the GP of Rs.5400/- after 20 years in IP cadre. Thus, the IP having total 26 years of service can get 5400/- which today we are not getting even after 34 years of service even if inducted to IP cadre after rendering 6 years service in PA cadre.
  5. 3rd MACP in GP of Rs.5400/- in PB-3(direct recruits).
  6. Upgradation of PSG “B” to JTS and ASP(HQ) to SP(HQ)
  7. In 6th cadre review of IPos, it is learnt that few STS posts would be down graded to JTS.
The Circle wise IP/ASP posts are furnished herewith for kind information.
Postal Divisions

Sl.
No.
Circle
ASP Dn
ASP
(HQ)
IP
(C)
IP
(OS)
ASP
Sub Dn
IP
Sub
Dn
ASP in HSG - I posts
Total
ASP
IP
1.
Andhra Pradesh
29
40
42
5
63
130
4
136
177
2.
Assam
7
9
9
-
6
35
4
26
44
3.
Bihar
7
20
22
3
18
78
6
51
103
4.
Chhattisgarh
5
4
4
1
6
27
1
16
32
5.
Delhi
4
7
9
-
13
-
5
29
09
6.
Gujarat
14
25
25
1
34
69
7
80
95
7.
Haryana
2
8
9
5
12
19
2
24
33
8.
Himachal Pradesh
8
2
5
4
8
26
1
19
35
9.
J & K
2
6
2
-
7
12
-
15
14
10
Jharkhand
3
6
7
1
9
23
3
21
31
11
Karnataka
24
31
19
-
40
88
8
103
107
12
Kerala
14
24
23
-
28
47
8
74
70
13
M.P
8
21
20
7
25
71
4
58
98
14
Maharashtra
20
41
37
4
69
75
18
148
116
15
North East
1
4
7
-
6
25
1
12
32
16
Orissa
13
14
15
4
22
66
3
52
85
17
Punjab
2
9
13
4
22
25
3
36
42
18
Rajasthan
11
21
24
3
33
68
3
68
95
19
Tamil Nadu
23
47
39
-
68
88
18
156
127
20
Uttarakhand
3
6
7
1
9
26
3
21
34
21
Uttar Pradesh
25
32
42
10
59
131
19
135
183
22
West Bengal
13
30
27
-
39
73
16
98
100

Total
238
407
407
53
596
1202
137
1378
1662
RMS Divisions

Sl.
No.
Circle
ASP Dn
ASP
(HQ)
IP
(OS)
ASP
Sub
Dn
IP
Sub Dn
ASP
in Mail Office/
TMO
IP in Mail office/
TMO
ASP in HSG I
Total
ASP
IP
1.
Andhra Pradesh
5
2
1
2
10
9
-
-
18
11
2.
Assam
3
1
1
2
5
-
-
-
6
6
3.
Bihar
2
3
3
2
9
11
5
-
18
17
4.
Chhatisgarh
1
-
-
-
1
1
2
-
2
3
5.
Delhi
8
3
-
2
1
7
14
4
24
15
6.
Gujarat
3
1
3
1
10
15
4
-
20
17
7.
Haryana
2
-
2
-
5
6
4
-
8
11
8.
Himachal Pradesh
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
1
9.
Jammu & Kashmir
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
1
1
10.
Jharkhand
2
-
3
-
3
2
-
-
4
6
11.
Karnataka
3
1
2
1
6
5
4
-
10
12
12.
Kerala
1
2
2
3
3
7
10
-
13
15
13.
M.P
3
-
2
6
6
-
3
-
9
11
14.
Maharashtra
8
-
2
1
11
35
13
-
44
26
15.
North East
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16.
Orissa
3
3
-
-
6
2
1
-
8
7
17.
Punjab
1
1
1
-
3
6
-
-
8
4
18.
Rajasthan
3
-
2
-
6
8
-
-
11
8
19.
Tamil Nadu
6
1
3
3
9
31
10
-
41
22
20.
Uttarakhand
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21.
Uttar Pradesh
13
3
4
8
16
15
2
-
39
22
22.
West Bengal
6
-
4
-
6
33
14
3
42
24

Total
75
21
35
31
117
193
87
7
327
239

All Circle Secretaries and CHQ Office bearers are requested to confirm the above data within week to General Secretary to enable to submit the proposal at the earliest. The total number Postal and RMS Divisions headed by PS Gr. B officers should also be reported. Any suggestion that is workable will be given due weightage in the proposal being formulated at CHQ level.